Mr. John Ayoh, a former Director of Information Technology of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, has narrated how he collected $600,000 for contract gratification for the former governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele allegedly.
John Ayoh testifies against Godwin Emefiele
Giving evidence before Justice Rahman Oshodi of Special Offences Court, Ikeja, Ayoh, while being led by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN) said this at the continuation of the trial of the embattled banker on Monday.
He claimed before the court that he spent eight years in the apex bank.
Godwin Emefiele got money in two transactions – John Ayoh
According to him, he received a letter from the agency concerning two transactions which he facilitated through Emefiele.
The Head of Procurement and Support Services, PSS, Department, explained to the court that the first envelope containing $400,000 was brought to his house in Lekki while he received the second envelope containing $200,000 at the Tinubu Square Head Office of the CBN.
He added that he was vested with powers to receive applications for award of contracts to select successful bidders.
According to him, the first leg of the transaction was at his residence in Lekki Phase 1 while the second envelope money he received occurred at the Tinubu Head Office of the CBN.
He said: “The man to deliver the second transaction came to our office in Lagos and I informed the governor but he said he did not want to see a third party that I should bring the envelope myself.
“I complied with the instruction and went to his office and delivered it.
“Mr John Adeola was the one I sent my address to and he came to my house.
“He is the governor’s assistant and the total money I received on his behalf was $400,000 and $200,000, respectively.”
Continuing, Ayoh informed the court that the vendors who allegedly brought the envelopes with money were in charge of the implementation of Netapp Storage Architectural and Infrastructural Services.
Under cross-examination by Mr. Olalekan Ojo (SAN), the first defence counsel, Ayoh told the court that his schedule of duties did not include running errands for Emefiele but he directly worked under him.
He confirmed to the court that Emefiele was not a member of the PSS but a member of the Major Contract Tender Committee, MCTC.
Ayoh claimed that he had never facilitated in the commission of any crime.
Ojo asked if the witness wrote in his statement that he was forced to aid or abet the commission of accepting gratification.
Ayoh said: “I do not remember the exact word that I used and I did not write in my statement that I opened the two envelopes on the two occasions to check the total sum of money.
“I wrote a statement and it implied that the money in the envelopes was given to me to influence the award of contract.
“I did not take part in the decision of the MCTC but I recommended that the award be given and I was not bribed.
“I was invited by the EFCC on February 17, I was not arrested but I returned home on administrative bail.”
Ayoh insisted that he operated under duress while he received the two envelopes from the contractors.
Ojo asked, “On your honour, did you indicate in your statement that you were acting under duress while running errands for the first defendant?”
Then, the prosecution objected to the question and argued that the statement of the witness was not before the court.
The first defence counsel sought that the statement of the defendant be admitted into evidence.
Following argument and counter argument, the judge admitted the statement of the witness into evidence.
Oyedepo asked the witness to show the court where it was written in his statement that he acted under duress.
“Godwin Emefiele bent rules”
The witness told the court that the instructions from Emefiele indicated that he bent rules.
Emefiele’s counsel also pleaded with the court to release the defendant to him on self-recognisance because he had not met with his bail application.
Subsequently Ojo prayed the court that the defendant would meet up before May 17.
There was no objections from the second defence counsel, Mr. Gbadamosi and the prosecution left the decision at the discretion of the court.
Prior to Ayoh testimony, Emefiele through his lawyer, Ojo, challenged the jurisdiction of court to hear the alleged abuse of office and multi billion dollars fraud leveled against him.
Mr. Ojo who led other counsel, appeared for Emefiele while Mr. appeared for the former CBN governor co-defendant, Henry Isioma-Omoile.
Ojo in his motion on notice dated April 24 argued that the court lacked the constitutional jurisprudence to hear the charge against Emefiele.
He said: ”there is need to consider jurisdictional objection before allowing this case.
“This defendant ought not to be arraigned before this court on constitutional grounds.
“We are saying that charges against the first defendant is unconstitutional.
“I urge your lordship to toe the part of legality and constitutionality to determine this application.”
Oyedepo however, urged the court to dismiss the application of the first defendant counsel, as it was a course to delay justice.
Oyedepo said that the approach was intended to take up from where the prosecution was coming from.
According to him, a collective resolution as a nation is to prevent undue delay in criminal matters.
“Your lordship, trial has commenced and witnesses have been assembled in court today to give evidence.
“The application of the first defendant is unconstitutional as this is a means to draw us backward.
“I humbly urge the court to discountenance the submission of defence on jurisdiction and allow the trial to continue.”
The judge rejected Emefiele’s request to discontinue hearing.
Oshodi deferred ruling on the preliminary objection to final judgement stage.
According to the judge, when the embattled former CBN governor was a arraigned on April 8, the prosecution informed the court of an accelerated hearing in which the defence did not object.
Emefiele was arraigned on an amended information of a 23-count charge by the EFCC, on alledged offences bordering on abuse of office, accepting gratification, accepting gifts through agents, corruption, and fraudulent property receipt.
The EFCC had on April 8 arraigned Emefiele on a 23-count charge bordering on abuse of office, accepting gratifications, corrupt demand, receiving property fraudulently obtained and conferring corrupt advantage, while his Omoile was arraigned on a three-count charge bordering on acceptance of gift by agents.
The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.
Justice Oshodi, thereafter, adjourned the case until May 3 for continuation of cross-examination.
