Top Stories

Court Dismisses Doctor Olaleye’s No-Case Submission

Justice Ramon Oshodi of the Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence court in Ikeja has said that the Medical Director of Cancer Care Foundation, Olufemi Olaleye has a case to answer.

The medical practictioner is standing trial on a two-count charge of defilement and sexual assault by penetration.

The defendant is charged with defilement of a-16-year old, who is his wife’s niece.

The trial judge on Thursday, dismissed the defendant’s application for want of merit.

According to Justice Oshodi, “I have carefully listened to the submissions of both prosecution and defence in this case. Six witnesses testified for the prosecution and various exhibits were tendered in evidence.

“At this stage, I am not to decide whether the evidence presented is believed or not. 

“I am not to decide the credibility or find way to attack the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, but what I am obligated to do at this stage is to decide whether something has been produced so far to prove this case worthwhile.

“The learned SAN has pointed out some evidence he considered as discrepancies in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, but I am afraid I am unable to give such an opinion regarding the discrepancies at this stage in a no case context.

“I am inclined to agree with the prosecution and I do believe that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses namely PW1 to PW6, and the exhibits tendered thus far has made it worthwhile to continue the trial.”

“The no case submission is hereby overrule, and accordingly, the defendant is hereby called upon to open his defence.

Prior to the judge’s ruling, Lead Counsel for the defence, Mr. Olusegun Fabunmi (SAN), had moved the application for no case submission and argued that the prosecution had not provided sufficient evidence against the defendant to warrant him to enter a defence.

Fabunmi argued that the evidence of the prosecution was not sufficient to convict the defendant, explaining that there was no time the defendant was caught committing the alleged offences.

“The defendant even denied committing the offence. There is no prima facie case linking the defendant to the offence.

“In the first instance, the survivor did not state that the offence was committed, it was after thought.

“We want the court to look at the testimony of PW6, the police officer, who said that the survivor did not produce the medical report at the time she alleged the offence was committed.

“We urged the court to grant the application and dismiss the case against the defendant.” 

The prosecution team led by the Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP, Dr. Babajide Martins, said that the prosecution has called six witnesses, including survivor to testify in the case.

Dr. Martins said that the prosecution had also tendered 21 exhibits to prove the case against the defendant.

According to him,:“There is no doubt about the identity of the defendant as the survivor gave account of how she was asked to suck the defendant’s sexual organ.

“The issue that PW2 (survivor) does not know when the incident happened does not arise. The testimony of the survivor corroborated what the prosecution alleged the defendant of.

“The law is settled, the probative value is in accordance with Section 24 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law.

“The defendant did not even say he did not live in that house.

“We have alleged defilement by penetration, tendered exhibits as well as documentary evidences.

“Even when the survivor was cross- examined by the learned silk, she informed the court that her defilement was during her menstrual circle.

“That indicates that the survivor knows her menstrual time.

“The survivor said that the defendant usually came when children were asleep.

“We humbly urge the court to dismiss the application of the defendant and ask him to enter his defence.”

The defendant had denied the charges, during arraignment.

An Investigative Police Officer Inspector Abe Leonard, had on January 26, given evidence against the defendant while a forensic expert at the Mirabel facility Mrs. Oyebimpe Akinbunmi, and another Inspector Esther Igbineweka testified against the defendant on January 4.

Mrs. Olabisi Ajayi-Kayode, a child forensic specialist with the Ceceyara Foundation, on January 3, also gave evidence against Dr. Olaleye.

The alleged victim, on December 21, 2022, reportedly testified against the defendant in a closed hearing in line with the 1999 Constitution and the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

The wife of the defendant, Mrs. Aderemi Fagbemi-Olaleye, who was the first prosecution witness on December 19, 2022, informed the court that her husband was diagnosed with sex addiction.

The alleged offences violate Sections 137 and 261 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.

However, the case was adjourned till March 29 for defendant to open defence.

Facebook Comments
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top